Left Navigation

Radionavigation Satellite Service (RNSS) systems, such as the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Russian Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS), are very important for worldwide navigation. Their transmission is mainly from the satellites to the Earth. These systems have widespread application for public safety, but they unfortunately have various spectrum allocations from approximately 900 MHz to 1700 MHz putting the radio astronomy water hole at risk.

The GLONASS transmissions, for example, are so powerful they are received in the side lobes and back lobes of radio telescopes no matter where in the sky the telescope is pointing as long as one of the satellites is above the horizon. Such interference may mean almost half of a radio telescope observations have to be discarded (Galt, 1991). The figure below demonstrates the potential deleterious effects of satellite transmissions:

 

The Good and The Bad

From: http://www.nrao.edu/whatisra/images/goodbad2.jpg

 

Protecting Radio Astronomy

National Radio Quiet Zone

In 1958, a 13,000 square mile National Radio Quiet Zone (NRQZ) was established in the United States near the state border between Virginia and West Virginia. It is designed to protect the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) in Green Bank, WV, and the radio receiving facilities for the United States Navy in Sugar Grove, WV (NRAO, 2004). Similar radio quiet zones exist or have been proposed for other large radio telescopes.

The IAU and WRC-00

The International Astronomical Union (IAU), the main professional organization of the world’s astronomers, has long recognized the importance of preserving astronomical observing sites from degradation, including light pollution and radio frequency interference. Commission 40 (Radio Astronomy) and Commission 50 (Protection of Existing and Potential Observatory Sites) of the IAU have been especially active in this regard (IAU, 2004). In North America and in Europe there are respective coordinating groups (CORF, the Committee on Radio Frequencies, and CRAF, the Committee for Radio Astronomy Frequencies) to integrate the interests of radio astronomers with those of others using the radio spectrum.

WRO-00, which met in Istanbul, Turkey, in 2000 set aside for protection all the frequencies between 71 and 275 GHz currently being used in radio astronomy, and added more than 90 GHz of spectrum to the 44 GHz of the spectrum already set aside in this frequency range (IDA, 2004). The frequencies previously allocated to satellite downlinks in the 71-275 GHz range were reset at frequencies not presently being used for scientific purposes. No satellites currently operate at these high frequencies, and protecting the 71-275 GHz range means no present commercial equipment needs to be changed.

Such protection is welcome for existing millimeter wave telescopes and for large projects coming on line, such as the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) and the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA).

 

Conclusions

Protecting radio astronomy is a difficult task. Legal protection of those frequencies of importance to radio astronomy is a requisite first step. Transmissions near important radio bands should be limited, particularly satellite transmission. This limitation can range from frequency restrictions to power restrictions and times of operation. Where possible, such transmissions should cease whenever the satellite is within the viewing area of a major radio telescope.

Radio telescopes situated in remote locations should receive radio quiet zone protection. Radio astronomers have become adept at shielding their equipment and developing algorithms for finding and eliminating RFI from their data. Radio astronomy is on the frontier of astronomical research. For it to continue, the astronomical community and the public must vigorously protect it.

 

References:

Appendix A. World radio astronomy observatories. NTIA web site at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/reports/pub9835/Raspapnd.htm.

Australian Telescope National Facility (ATNF). International Interference Mitigation (for Radio Astronomy) at: http://www.atnf.csiro.au/SKA/intmit/

Exploratorium at: http://www.exploratorium.edu/learning_studio/news/october97/mainstory5_oct97.html.

Galt, J. In: Crawford DL. Editor. Light Pollution, Radio Interference and Space Debris. Conference Series 17, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 1991, 213-221.

International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) at: http://www.darksky.org

IAU Commissions at: http://www.iau.org/Organization/divcom/commissions.html.

International Telecommunications Union at: http://www.itu.int/aboutitu/overview/foreward.html

Kitchin CR. Astrophysical Techniques. 4th Edition. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 2003, 103.

National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) at: http://www.nrao.edu/whatisra/rfi.shtml

Schroeder N, Murray M. Radiofrequency spectrum allocations in the United States. Background paper. January 2004. At: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/chart_03.htm.

SETI League. Significant radio astronomy frequencies; IAU protected segments at: http://www.setileague.org/articles/protectd.htm ; General information at: http://www.setileague.org/general/waterhol.htm.

Ukaranet at: http://www.ukaranet.org.uk/basics/frequency_allocation.htm.

First posted 11 February 2005

 

|Back|

 

Back to Top | Essay List